said Julio Cortázar that as the boxing "the novel always win points, while the story should win by Knock-out." In this context, my concern arises: Is the test fits in the boxing metaphor? And if so, how would you do?. I think it is reasonable to consider the essay as winning a fight by judges decision. That is, test the reader stops to become the challenger to become an analyst with arguments that ultimately takes a stand on what he read.
think the test is just that, a statement of arguments on a subject expects the reader to take sides and develop value judgments. Just as judges in a fight readers in the trial made subjective judgments about the arguments presented and, in one way or another, take a stand, assess, decide and formulate a verdict, as in boxing, is not always unanimous, and perhaps that is what fascinating test: leave no one indifferent, or is convinced by the arguments or not; or takes the place of trial or is in an opposite shore. For this reason, I consider that the test is as important as the background as it is not enough to expose some arguments, it is also necessary to mold them, harmonize them and present the target audience, as this is ultimately responsible for approving or not meeting the target test. But unlike a boxing match, to give a good fight argumentative, and essayist has won.
0 comments:
Post a Comment